I am the They/Them your parents warned you about

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
commandrogyne
rhq274

image

10 pounds may not be something important to you, but it may save the lives of entire families somewhere. Do not hesitate to help, even if it is a little!!

aces-and-angels

image

to my moots/lovely lurkers: raghad has been vetted! she appears as #221 on el-shab-hussein/nabulsi's google sheet

please do not hesitate to give her account a follow! donate if you can- her campaign has been active since march and has yet to earn 10% of its intended goal. share regardless🖤

certainprincesslover

They have raised £2,237 of the £55,000 goal, but they still need £52,763 more, so please don’t hesitate to donate and/or reblog! Anything you can do will help!

baronmpontmercy
sophiamcdougall

UK people, after you vote, do this -- you have until the 11th of July, 2024 -- i.e a week from today, the day of the general election! It's a consultation on new guidelines for schools on sexuaility and gender and they are bigoted as fuck. Also just weird and stupid. We absolutely must try to stop 12-year-olds dying by suicide! Fuck under-12-year-olds, though, they're on their own.

Mainly, though, it's about forcing teachers to misgender students and making it optional to admit same-sex couples exist.

Yes, this was dreamed up by the Tories, but Starmer's Labour is too transphobic that we can trust they won't go through with this. Let the new government know you won't tolerate a new Section 28. There's advice on how to respond here, but be sure to use your own words!


notquiteaghost
wondersmith-and-sons

image
image

best photo to come out of this election

becausegoodheroesdeservekidneys

@rhyperographer Yeah those are indeed the candidates. Count Binface stands in opposition in whichever constituency is the incumbent Prime Minister's. The guy next to him is the Monster Raving Loony Party, who do something similar but don't limit themselves to the PM.

Believe it or not, this is actually a great and noble tradition of UK politics, and I invite everyone to look up Count Binface's manifesto.

terastalungrad

Here it is:

BINFACE MANIFESTO 2024

BLOODY LOYAL TO WHEREVER I’M STANDING FOR ELECTION

1 all Water bosses to take a dip in british rivers, to see how they like it

2 national service to be introduced for all former prime ministers

3 wifi on trains that works

4 trains that work

5 the reintroduction of ceefax

6 children in need to finally get round to fixing pudsey’s eye

7 traffic on northallerton high street to be fixed by a new space bridge, bypassing both level crossings

8 european countries to be invited to join the uk, creating a new ‘union of europe’, if you will

9 wallace and gromit to be knighted, for services to wensleydale

10 I pledge to build at least one affordable house

11 croissants to be price-capped at £1.10, and 99 flakes to cost 99p

12 national yorkshire pudding day to be a bank holiday (except for banks)

13 loud snacks to be banned from cinemas and theatres

14 pensions to be double-locked, but with a little extra chain on the side

15 claudia winkleman’s fringe to be grade 1-listed

16 new series of gladiators to feature ’90s gladiators against age-appropriate contenders

17 minsters’ pay to be tied to that of nurses for the next 100 years

18 shops that play christmas music before december to be closed down and turned into public libraries

19 to combat the uk’s increasingly wet climate, all british citizens to be offered stilts

20 a ban on speakerphones on public transport. offenders to be forced to live with matt hancock for a year

21 the mini golf course at richmond swimming pool to host the open championship

22 mps to live in the area they wish to serve for 4 years before election, to improve local representation

23 the hand dryer in the gents’ urinals at the crown & treaty, uxbridge to be moved to a more sensible position.

24 count binface to represent the uk at eurovision

gallusrostromegalus
vamprisms

minos was such a pussy. if my wife gave birth to an epic minotaur baby i wouldn't have locked him in a labyrinth. i would have taken him to the mcdonalds play place (athens) every day and let him eat as many stray mcnuggets (athenians) off the floor as he wanted. i love you hungry son

vamprisms

(pulling a painted vase out of my wallet) and this is my youngest at his first nose ring fitting. isn't he handsome

vaspider
vaspider

By Delivery via email Only CONFIDENTIAL AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE NerdyKeppie LLC July 3, 2024 4110 SE Hawthorne Blvd #197 Portland, OR 97214 help@nerdykeppie.com Re: RESPONSE REQUIRED - Unauthorized Use of Gilbert Baker To Whom It May Concern, CMG Worldwide, Inc. (“CMG”) is the worldwide agent for Gilbert Baker Foundation (“Client”) in matters relating to Gilbert Baker. Our Client is the proprietor of certain trademark rights, copyrights, rights of association and sponsorship, and the right of publicity in and to the name, image, and likeness of Gilbert Baker (all of which is collectively referred to as the “Property”). Specifically, our Client is the owner of the United States federal trademark, “GILBERT BAKER,” Reg. No. 6336611, for clothing, registered at the principal register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. As such, CMG pursues and prosecutes all claims and causes of action arising out of, or relating to, the unauthorized use of the Property. We were recently informed that NerdyKeppie LLC (“Company”) has been using the Property in association with the sale of shirts, hoodies, tank tops, skirts, dresses, shorts, shoes, swimsuits, swim trunks, robes, coats, and scarfs (“Merchandise”) on your website, https://nerdykeppie.com, as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto. Please be advised that such unauthorized use is in contravention to the aforementioned rights and will not be tolerated. Your Company’s unauthorized use of our Client’s trademark rights in connection with the Merchandise is a violation of federal trademark law and unfair competition law. For one, such use in connection with the Merchandise is a violation of section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114, as an infringement of our Client’s United States federal trademark. Such use also constitutes a violation of, Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), as such usage necessarily implies a misleading designation of source origin, endorsement, sponsorship, or approval by our Client of your Merchandise. The Lanham Act is premised on the belief that the benefit or property right that one has invested time, effort, and money into developing should be protected from unauthorized commercial use. In essence, the Lanham Act prohibits one from “reaping what another has sown” without fair compensation. Therefore, in order to promptly and amicably resolve this matter, we demand NerdyKeppie LLC take the following action no later than July 12, 2024: (A) Permanently and immediately remove all images and references to the Merchandise from all websites under which you have advertised or sold the Merchandise, and confirm to us in writing that you have done so; and (B) Provide us with a complete accounting detailing the extent to which you have utilized the aforementioned rights, including all sales and promotional placement of the Merchandise. It is our hope that this matter can be resolved amiably. However, if we are unable to arrive at such a resolution, we are prepared to advise our clients of all available legal avenues to ensure that such unauthorized uses cease and that our clients are fairly compensated for such uses.ALT

welp.

Guess we'll be removing the Gilbert Baker 1977 Pride Flag from our site, along with the links to the Gilbert Baker Foundation.

Heads up to other queer artists: if you use the original 1977 flag in anything, definitely don't make any reference to who created it in your listings or you might get threatened by the Gilbert Baker Foundation! :)

the-gamling-dog

Happy End Of Pride Month From CMG /s

vaspider

I'm just here going "... so, to be clear, you are issuing legal threats to a small Jewish-owned company in the name of Gilbert Baker... because we used his name in identifying the colorway associated with his flag?"

My wife just looked it up -- we've made less than $500 in the last 5 years on any items in that colorway. It is not popular. We spend a lot of time educating young queer people what that flag even is and why it's important.

Well, spent. Because we're not doing that anymore.

Good job spreading awareness of Gilbert Baker's work, guys!

briearesea

Unreal. What would Gilbert Baker think?

image

~ Gilbert Baker


Apparently in 2019, after Baker had passed away, the Foundation partnered with an LGBTQ business student group called Pride Corp. and became litigious about the use of the flag?

Nice work guys, honoring Gilbert Baker by shitting on independent queer creators (who are doing your job for you) sure is one way to do it.

vaspider

It's specifically about the name. We can use the flag, but giving credit to Gilbert Baker as its creator by calling it the 'Gilbert Baker flag' is the issue, because we are 'using the name for promotion.'

It's ridiculous on any number of levels, especially that WE HAVE TO TELL PEOPLE WHO HE WAS. They don't KNOW. Gilbert Baker's name is not a draw for our customers. It's a history lesson.

mayra-quijotescx

[Image description: White text against a darkened background of the red, orange, yellow, and green stripes of a pride flag, saying, "A true flag is not something you can really design. A true flag is torn from the soul of the people. A flag is something that everyone owns, and that's why they work. The Rainbow Flag is like other flags in that sense: it belongs to the people." The quote is from Gilbert Baker. End description.]

vaspider

Update:

They're asking us for nearly 2x what we've made from anything using that color scheme because we referred to it using the name of the original artist.

Fellow artists, I would advise you that if you have anything using the colors of the 8-stripe flag and calling it by or in any way referencing the name of the original artist that you either a) take it down or b) rename the flag, lest they ask you for twice what you've ever made.

This may have the unfortunate effect of keeping us from ever talking about that particular Jewish artist of blessed memory, and that does seem like a strange tactic for the Gilbert Baker Foundation to take, but...


Hello,   All instances of "Gilbert Baker" have been removed. We have made a net profit of ~$485 since 2017 on all items utilitizing that color scheme, all of which are original designs by me utilizing only that color scheme, which is not covered by the trademark. We have never used the name for promotional purposes as that would be beyond pointless; no one knows who he is and we carried the flag to educate younger queers because of that fact.   I assume this closes the matter.   Cheers, SpiderALT
Hello Spider,  Pleasure to meet you and thank you for your prompt response.  Although removal of our Client’s trademark from your website has been taken note of, we, nor our Client, view this matter as resolved until a settlement is reached.  Given your cooperation and the extent of the unauthorized use, we would be willing to enter into a confidential settlement in the amount of $750 USD, in exchange for a complete release of all claims our Client may have against NerdyKeppie arising from this matter. Please note that such an offer is generous in light of the fact that our Client may be entitled to a host of remedies, including, but not limited to, applicable damages under the Lanham Act. We hope for your continued cooperation in reaching an agreement, which ensures our Client is justly compensated.  All rights reserved.  Sincerely, Jake Morizio Law Clerk  N  A  S  H  V   I   L  L  E   🎵Need music for your next TV/film project? Check out our new CMG Music website!🎵  CMG Worldwide | CMG Speaks | CMG Music | CMG Brochure | 60 Minutes SegmentALT
To be clear, you want a settlement for almost twice the amount we've made from any material using the color scheme of the 1977 Pride Flag, which color scheme is explicitly not copyrighted or trademarked, on basis that we spoke of the flag's creator, and you think that proposing this to a family-owned queer Jewish business is the best way for the Foundation to honor the memory of Gilbert Baker (z''l)?  I will pass your proposed settlement to our legal counsel and we'll be back in touch.  Cheers, SpiderALT
vaspider

To be very very clear:

This isn't about us using the flag per se. It is because when we used the flag's color scheme, we referred to it as "the Gilbert Baker flag," which is what it's normally called, and the Gilbert Baker Foundation trademarked his name 2 years after our company was founded.

So if you do use that color scheme, find something else to call it.

Don't use his name. Seriously. They'll come after you for using it for "promotional purposes."